![]() This is very cumbersome (to the extent it is not really realistic) to achieve today and requires a lot of duplication of both model and layers. Instead a number of views would be created that saves not only zoom level and position but also what layers are visible and not (as appropriate for the purpose of that particular view). In a medium complex drawing it may be too much details to have all layers in a drawing visible at once. Yes I know - that isn’t done in 5 minutes but I think that can make your life easier in the long run and will cover even more customer.Ĭhange icons from black on white to white on black depe. I don’t mean that you need to cover every single thing but the main “performance jeopardy’s” should be covered with an on/off switch. Maybe it would make sense to think about a new dialog in the “Application Preferences” to let the user decide what kind of feature are absolutely needed regarding to his/her work-task / equipment. I really appreciate your effort to find the best middle way between software features and performance but I think also it’s a tough call to appraise worldwide the overall customer equipment to make the software workable to the best for everybody. ![]() We know that you need to have always software performance in your mind to decide which features / tools can / should be implemented and on which way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |